Properties
Category
English
Similar Topics
Statistics
Comments
17
Participants
6
Subscribers
0
Votes
2
Views
3583
Share
Tangent to curve through outside point
Answered
Since it is part of the math program in the Netherlands I want to demonstrate that also tangents to curves exists through an outside point. (Not on the curve)
The Tangent command seems to allow this straightforward since it asks for a point and a curve. But it does not result in the real tangents.
I do not succeed in finding a general approach. :( For example, in the attached file, not all tangents are found when the point is moved.
Is there a general approach possible? :confused:
Paul van de Veen
 GeoGebra
 Help
 Partners

Contact us
 Feedback & Questions
 This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
 +43 677 6137 2693
© 2022 International GeoGebra Institute
Hi,
The online 'Help' says
That isn't what you would expect from the name of the tool!
... and Tangent[point,curve] gives the tangent to the curve where the normal from the point to the curve meets the curve!
Kathryn
Hello Kathryn,
Yes, the name of the tool is confusing/misleading.
Of course there is a theoretical perfect approach.
Given function f and point P we can derive for the tangent Segment(P,Q) with y(Q)=f(x(Q))and with x(Q) following as the roots of the equation: f'(x) (y(P)f(x)) / (x(P)x) = 0
Unfortunately, the Zero function does not gives all the correct Roots/Nulstelle/Nulpunten of this equation.
Also the intersect with y=0 does not give the correct roots. At least not all of them.
So there is also not an easy tool to create for this job.
Sad. :cry:
Paul
Tricky one!
Here's my attempt. You can adjust 'n' and 'h' if you want. Hopefully someone will be along in a minute with a nicer solution :)
https://ggbm.at/544135
My compliments! I considered such using a list of the intersecting points but I could not get it running.
I have to comtemplate your Union[list2, {}] :o
That's to remove duplicates :)
I'm sure there's a simpler way to do that too but I can't recall it ATM :)
Hi Kathryn
You clarified a lot of points, unfortunately I could not understand this notation
Help please
regards
This is indeed not clear. (worse, it is not true)
The idea of Markus makes sense but instead of g(x) = (f(x)  b) / (x  a)  f'(x) and finding its roots by stepwise Intersection it proves to work much better when we consider the function h(x)=g(x) = (f(x)b) (xa)f'(x) since this is a more regular function.
Intersect gves now all roots immediately.
Hi,
Sorry  I think it's my poor English!
The tangent tool appears to give three different types of tangent:
1) with a conic, we get what we expect  the tangent to a curve from a point
2) with a function, we get the tangent to the curve at the point on the curve where x = x(A)
3) with a parametric function (Curve), we get another interpretation, as you can see in the attached file (I hope!)
Kathryn
https://ggbm.at/544137
Yes of course, that's much better :flushed:
BTW, Root[g] is better than using Intersect[ ]
https://ggbm.at/544139
:anguished: WAOW! I'm impressed. :anguished:
Regards, jtico
It can be done automatically without the rootseeking approach of Markus.
Lijst={Intersect[g, b]}
This gives in a list all zero's and adding tangential lines to each of them (x,f(x)) is easy. Works excellent! :D
Until I saved and reopened again. :imp: Above statement is then causes an error! See screenprint. What a pity since the possibility of finding roots and adding them to a list would be a wonderful possibility.
Hope that this can be repaired!
https://ggbm.at/544141
Hi Kathryn
Your efforts is highly appreciated,
thanks for clarifying your ideas . :laughing:
Try:
Lijst={Root[g]}
Yes, this works better. In the attached .ggb I get all tangents to a polynoom. This is a nice compact approach.
Curious, I can not redefine the function.
https://ggbm.at/544145
Nice work there :)
Regards, jtico
hello
you can open protocol of worksheet and move the function above another objects
if an objects is dependnt of function and the redefined function is down GG says you the redefinition is not possible
saludos
It has nothing to do with the order.
I have used the command Root[f] but this requires the function to be a polynome.
As soon as I add for example a sin(x) to this polynomial, the message "can nor redefine the function" appears.
As long as I make "polynomial" changes, I can redefine the function.
The underlaying problem is that there is no safe as well as fast method to find the roots of an arbitrarily function. There will be always a function where any root seeking method fails.
Therefore, finding tangents from an outside point to an arbitrarily function is still an unresolved question. For polynomials, this approach works fine.
Paul
Comments have been locked on this page!