# Standard error of coefficients for regressions

Something that would be extremely useful, but which is difficult to find even in litterature, is to be able to get the standard error of the coefficients/parameters determined by regressional analysis.

Say you do a physics experiment. You gather data in a table and draw a graph. From the theory it is clear that a linear graph would be appropriate and you use regression to find it.

Through googling I have found that the standard error of the slope of the line to be

- ErrorSlope = sqrt( SumSquaredErrors[list1,f]/((Length[list1]-2)*SXX[list1]) )

where list1 contains the data points and f is the line of regression.

This allows students to measure and reason round errors, margins, confidence intervals etc in a natural way. I am sure there are methods to determine the standard errors for ANY parameter in ANY regressional model (bootstrap methods if nothing else). To do so is unfortunately very difficult unless you studied statistics at university level before you became a teacher, something at leas I didn't do. However, to find these methods and to implement them in GeoGebra is an investment well worth the effort for it would add to the power of GeoGebra and make it do even more that other packages can't do.

This could be implemented in the two-variable dialog with a checkbox to show parameters with or without standard errors. Perhaps even with an option to give values to a specified confidence interval (e.g. 95% which roughly doubles the interval).

I imagine (guessing, really) that since this is mostly mathematics and not so much an interface question, that this project could be assigned "suitable for beginners" status or be assigned to a GSOC student next time round.

Physics teachers around the world will thank you for this :-D

Adding these statistical features is planned for v5.0 :)

Thanks! this is great news. Stuff like this has simply been too difficult to calculate before. The two-variable dialog and the probability calculator have a perfect combination of simplicity and power. Keep up the good work! :)

This is still happening I hope?

:-)

A year has gone by so its time to nag agian :smiley_cat:

Looking forward to have this feature...

Loading...Comments have been locked on this page!