Non polynomial fit: how to proceed?
Hi Murkle, Hi all,
Extending the conversation of the following thread, I haven’t found a satisfactory solution. My problem is very simple and banal in Physics: I want the student to recover... simply (without CAS) the adjustment values when a model is given.
Let me be more precise. Indeed, in the case of charging a capacitor or a free fall with friction (eg "the fall of Felix Baumgartner"), the phenomenon is modeled by an exponential fit! With GeoGebra , the phenomenon is modeled very easily with :
- Fit[list1, a*(1- e^(-b*x))]
Where a and b are initialized sliders. That works very well. :D
The problem is that you can’t recover the "adjusted values of a and b "! :cry: :cry:
Indeed , the commands
- Coefficients[ <Polynomial> ] and Coefficients[ <Conic> ]
No longer work...
I just think it hasn't been programmed: are you agree? :confused:
Would it be possible to improve this command? :confused: :confused:
Thank you in advance. :D
Phil
hello
try
b=-f''(0)/f'(0)
a=f'(0)/b
or
g = TaylorPolynomial[f, 0, 2]
coef = Coefficients[g]
b = -2 (Element[coef, 1] / Element[coef, 2])
a = Element[coef, 2] / b
saludos
Hi Juan Vicente,
Thank you for your answer, but something similar has already been proposed by Noël and in a pedagogical way this solution is not satisfactory to be given to a student. :( :(I just want the student to use the GeoGebra Coefficients[] tools, already used for other approaches and test the new model. :anguished:
I wanted to know if it is very difficult to improve the Coefficients[] command (very simple in this case)? I think the challenge is to retrieve the values of internal variables that are displayed, no?
Thanks again Juan Vicente for your so quick answer, even if it’s not completely satisfactory.
Phil
hello
OK, i think now i understand you
you need some like this for a general case
i hope developers do it
saludos
you can move the points
https://ggbm.at/566933
Hi Juan Vicente,
Thank you: that's a nice workaround. :D
I hope so. It would be greatfull! :confused:Cheers,
Phil
Yes, good idea!
Please try 4.9.265.0
Hi Murkle,
Thank you very much! It’s OK for me.It’s a nice improvement for the students.
Thanks for them. :D
Cheers,
Phil
Comments have been locked on this page!